In the fast-paced beauty and personal care sector, innovation is constant. New textures, actives, and packaging formats emerge each season, driven by demands for efficacy, sustainability, and sensorial appeal. Behind every successful launch lies a critical safeguard: stability testing.
With decades of formulation and regulatory experience across global brands, I have seen how stability testing directly influences commercial success. It is both a regulatory requirement and a foundation for consumer trust, brand reputation, and long-term market viability. This article outlines the principles of cosmetic stability testing, referencing ISO/TR 18811:2018, the Cosmetics Europe (Colipa) Guidelines, and ICH Q1A, while offering practical strategies for manufacturers.
Why Stability Testing Matters
Cosmetics are complex systems from emulsions to solutions these may be containing actives, preservatives, fragrances, and functional excipients. Over time, they face challenges such as:
- Physical changes: phase separation, viscosity shifts, crystallization, sedimentation
- Chemical degradation: oxidation, hydrolysis, loss of actives
- Microbiological risks: contamination, preservative failure
- Packaging interactions: leaching, adsorption, incompatibility with closures
Without robust testing, products may become rancid, lose efficacy, discolour, or fail microbiologically, leading to consumer dissatisfaction, regulatory non-compliance, recalls, and reputational damage.
E COURSE: Cosmetic Stability Testing: Principles, Standards & Best Practice Formulation Now Available!
Understanding Product Stability
Product stability is the ability of a cosmetic to maintain its intended appearance, functionality, and safety over time. A stable product resists phase separation, colour or odour changes, and loss of performance.
Poor stability can lead to:
- Direct impacts: unacceptable aesthetics, reduced performance, safety concerns
- Indirect impacts: recalls, revenue loss, erosion of brand loyalty
Stability is not absolute; minor acceptable changes may occur. Professional judgement, supported by specifications and testing, is essential.
Measuring Stability: Attributes and Packaging Compatibility
Stability testing monitors both formulation attributes and packaging interactions.
Key product attributes include:
- Aesthetics: appearance, colour, odour, viscosity
- Functionality: pH, active concentration, foam, rheology
- Safety: microbiological integrity, oxidative stability, chemical degradation
Packaging compatibility is equally critical. Packaging may cause weight loss, volatile loss, adsorption of actives, leakage, or degradation (e.g., stress cracking, corrosion in aerosols). A robust program evaluates product and packaging together.
International Standards: ISO, Colipa, and ICH
ISO/TR 18811:2018
A global methodology for cosmetic stability testing, covering batch selection, stress conditions, and monitoring parameters, with emphasis on tailoring protocols to product and packaging.
Colipa Guidelines
Practical, industry-driven guidance for accelerated and real-time testing, balancing scientific rigor with commercial feasibility. Widely used across the EU.
Achieve regulatory compliance, supply chain transparency and meet your sustainability initiatives with WERCS Studio software. Learn more here!
ICH Q1A
Pharmaceutical guidance often adapted for cosmetics with borderline claims (e.g., anti-aging). It defines long-term, intermediate, and accelerated testing across climatic zones, with statistical shelf-life evaluation.
Together, these frameworks support harmonized global distribution and regulatory compliance.
Designing a Robust Stability Program
As we all know a protocol has to be compliant to regulations but also suitable for each company following it, from experience on these standards a comprehensive stability program should include:
- Risk assessment: identify vulnerable ingredients (e.g., oxidizable oils, sensitive actives).
- Accelerated studies: predict degradation pathways.
- Real-time monitoring: confirm shelf life under normal conditions.
- Packaging evaluation: assess compatibility with plastics, glass, airless pumps, aerosols.
- Microbiological challenge tests: ensure preservative efficacy.
- Documentation: maintain clear records for regulatory submissions and audits.
The goal is a realistic shelf life that ensures safety and performance while minimizing recalls or reformulations.
Aspects to Address in Stability Testing
- Stage/scale of batches
- Early tests may use development or pilot batches.
- Final stability must use representative commercial formulations.
- Matrixing and bracketing are acceptable when documented, avoiding unnecessary repetition across different pack sizes.
- Test procedures and conditions
- Use both accelerated and real-time tests. Accelerated tests estimate shelf life; long-term studies confirm it.
- Conditions should simulate storage, transport, and consumer use.
- Accelerated stability testing
- Common temperatures: 30°C, 37°C, 40°C, 45°C, 50°C (±2°C).
- Durations for a standard 12 months shelf life:
- 12 months at room temperature
- 34 weeks at 30°C
- 12 weeks at 40°C
- 2-4 weeks at 50°C (only in valid for some formulations)
- Humidity: ambient or controlled (75–80% RH).
- Low-temperature tests assess resilience to transport extremes.
- High humidity evaluates packaging barrier properties.
- Temperature/humidity cycling
- Freeze/thaw cycles and variable conditions test robustness during distribution.
- Particularly relevant for emulsions and liquids prone to crystallization or clouding.
- Other stress factors
- Vibration: simulates transport.
- Centrifugation: accelerates phase separation by generating a relative acceleration of the gravity force.
- Light exposure: assesses photostability.
- Physical, chemical, and microbiological aspects
- Physical: phase separation, viscosity changes, crystallization
- Chemical: oxidation, hydrolysis, active degradation
- Microbiological: preservative efficacy, contamination
- Packaging: adsorption, leakage, corrosion, propellant loss
Practical Considerations for Manufacturers
- Shade and fragrance variations: Test representative extremes; fragrances often interact more strongly with formulations.
- Batch scale: Move from lab batches to pilot and production batches as development progresses.
- Packaging orientation: Test products stored upright, inverted, and on their side to simulate consumer use.
- Confirmatory monitoring: Retain production samples and monitor periodically to validate accelerated predictions.
- Consumer feedback: Supplement laboratory data with trade surveys and market feedback to refine stability programs.
Commercial and Legal Implications
Poor stability can have severe consequences recalls, litigation, and reputational damage. Legislation such as the EU Cosmetics Regulation requires manufacturers to demonstrate product safety, with stability data forming part of the Product Information File (PIF). In the US, the FDA does not mandate a specific protocol, but manufacturers are expected to ensure product safety and shelf life. Globally, regions such as ASEAN, Mercosur, and China require stability evidence in regulatory submissions, often referencing ISO or ICH principles.
Conclusion
Stability testing is a strategic safeguard that ensures cosmetic products deliver on their promises from the first application to the last. By integrating the stablished appropriate standards such as ISO, Colipa or ICH, formulators can design stability programs that are both scientifically robust and commercially viable.
For brands, this translates into consumer trust, regulatory compliance, and market success. For formulators, it is the art of balancing innovation with reliability, a discipline that defines the credibility of the beauty industry.
The views, opinions and technical analyses presented here are those of the author or advertiser, and are not necessarily those of ULProspector.com or UL Solutions. The appearance of this content in the UL Prospector Knowledge Center does not constitute an endorsement by UL Solutions or its affiliates.
All content is subject to copyright and may not be reproduced without prior authorization from UL Solutions or the content author.
The content has been made available for informational and educational purposes only. While the editors of this site may verify the accuracy of its content from time to time, we assume no responsibility for errors made by the author, editorial staff or any other contributor.
UL Solutions does not make any representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy, applicability, fitness or completeness of the content. UL Solutions does not warrant the performance, effectiveness or applicability of sites listed or linked to in any content.