This technical guide explores the mechanisms of moisture-induced caking and the strategic use of anhydrous compounds to ensure powder stability. We examine the functional properties of common agents, emerging clean-label alternatives, and critical regulatory limits for 2026 formulations.
The Science of Caking
Caking occurs when dry, powdered particles absorb environmental humidity, leading to the formation of liquid bridges that eventually solidify into hard “crystal bridges”. This process is common in crystalline solids like salt and sugar, as well as amorphous materials like milk powder. Without intervention, these ingredients lose their ability to flow, disrupting automated packaging lines and reducing consumer usability.
Functional Mechanisms: How They Work
Anti-caking agents generally function through two primary mechanisms:
- Moisture Absorption: Anhydrous compounds like Silicon Dioxide (E551) act as “molecular sponges,” trapping moisture before it can reach the host powder.
- Surface Coating: Agents like Magnesium Stearate (E470b) create a physical, water-repellent barrier around individual particles, reducing friction and preventing mechanical interlocking.
Backed by 130 years of history delivering on trust and safety, ULTRUS™ software helps customers achieve their regulatory, sustainability, supply chain and safety goals. Learn more here!
Selecting the Right Agent for Your Application
The choice of agent is less about picking a “universal winner” and more about matching the solution to your specific product chemistry and processing reality:
- Powder Moisture Behavior: Identify if your product is highly hygroscopic (e.g., fruit juice powders) or prone to “bridging” in humidity.
- Fat Content and Stickiness: Powders with high surface oils benefit from agents that can absorb both water and oil, such as Calcium Silicate.
- Processing & Distribution Stress: Consider the blending shear and mixing time, as well as vibration and stacking pressure during long transit times in varying climates.
- Sensory Impact: Validate that the agent does not interfere with the dissolution rate or create an unpleasant texture or “mouthfeel” in flavor-sensitive products.
Clean-Label Comparison Table
As consumer demand for transparency grows, formulators are pivoting toward plant-derived alternatives to traditional mineral salts.
| Agent | Source | Primary Mechanism | Best For | Technical Benefit |
| Rice Hull Concentrate | Ground rice hulls | Moisture absorption | Spice blends, salt | Direct replacement for Silicon Dioxide; neutral flavor. |
| Bamboo Fiber | Bamboo shoots | Hydrogen bonding | Baking mixes | Enhances structure while reducing starch adhesiveness. |
| Potato Starch | Native potato starch | Viscosity control | Shredded cheese | Excellent water-holding capacity at lower relative humidities. |
| Cassava Flour | Cassava root | Physical barrier | Gluten-free baking | Provides moisture capture with added potassium and magnesium. |
| Carrot Fiber | Upcycled pulp | Porosity binding | Nutraceuticals | Sustainable story with a subtle natural color benefit. |
2026 Market Trends & Compliance
Formulators must adhere to strict limits to maintain Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) status:
- US (FDA): Silicon dioxide is typically limited to 2% by weight of the final food product.
- EU (EFSA): Regulations limit Silicon Dioxide (E551) to a maximum of 10g/kg (1%) in dried powdered foods.
- Labeling: All agents must be clearly declared on the ingredient list by their common name or E-number to meet transparency requirements.
Sources
- How Anti Caking Agents in Food Prevent Clumping and Improve Shelf Life (KINGWAY)
- Anti-Caking Agents in the Food Industry (BEX Foods)
- The Basics of Anti-Caking Agents (UL Prospector)
- Evaluation of Natural Anti-caking Agents (Chalmers Publication Library)
- 21 CFR Part 172 Subpart E — Anticaking Agents (eCFR)
The views, opinions and technical analyses presented here are those of the author or advertiser, and are not necessarily those of ULProspector.com or UL Solutions. The appearance of this content in the UL Prospector Knowledge Center does not constitute an endorsement by UL Solutions or its affiliates.
All content is subject to copyright and may not be reproduced without prior authorization from UL Solutions or the content author.
The content has been made available for informational and educational purposes only. While the editors of this site may verify the accuracy of its content from time to time, we assume no responsibility for errors made by the author, editorial staff or any other contributor.
UL Solutions does not make any representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy, applicability, fitness or completeness of the content. UL Solutions does not warrant the performance, effectiveness or applicability of sites listed or linked to in any content.