By Vishu Shah, Consultek
Chemical Failure
Very few plastics are totally impervious to all chemicals. Chemical failure occurring from exposing the products to certain chemicals is quite common. Residual or molded-in stress, high temperatures, and external loading tend to aggravate the problem.
Environmental Failure
Plastics exposed to outdoor environments are susceptible to many types of detrimental factors or environmental failure. Ultraviolet rays, humidity, microorganisms, ozone, heat, and pollution are major environmental factors that seriously affect plastics. The effect can be anywhere from a mere loss of color, slight crazing and cracking, to a complete breakdown of the polymer structure.
Analyzing Failures
The first step in analyzing any type of failure is to determine the cause of the failure. Before proceeding with any elaborate tests, some basic information regarding the product must be gathered. If the product is returned from the field, have the district manager or consumer give you basic information, such as the date of purchase, date of installation, date when the first failure encountered, geographic location, types of chemicals used with or around the product, whether the product was used indoors or outdoors. All this information is very vital if one is to analyze the defective product proficiently. For example, if the report from the field and the defective product indicate a certain type of chemical was used with the product, one can easily check the chemical compatibility of the product or go one step further and simulate the actual use condition using the same chemical. Recordkeeping also simplifies the task of failure analysis. A simple date code or cavity identification number will certainly enhance the traceability. Many types and styles of checklists to help analyze the failures have been developed. Seven basic methods are employed to analyze product failure.
| 1. Visual Examination | 5. Mechanical Testing |
| 2. Identification Analysis | 6. Thermal Analysis |
| 3. Stress Analysis | 7. Nondestructive Testing (NDT) Techniques |
| 4. Microtoming |
By zeroing in on the type of failure, one can easily select the appropriate method of failure analysis.
Visual Examination
A careful visual examination of the returned part can reveal many things. Excessive splay marks indicate that the materials were not adequately dried before processing. The failure to remove moisture from hydroscopic materials can lower the overall physical properties of the molded article and in some cases even cause them to become brittle. The presence of foreign material and other contaminants is also detrimental and could have caused the part to fail. Burn marks on molded articles are easy to detect. They are usually brown streaks and black spots. These marks indicate the possibility of material degradation during processing causing the breakdown of molecular structure leading to overall reduction in the physical properties. Sink marks and weak weld lines, readily visible on molded parts, represent poor processing practices and may contribute to part failure.
A careful visual examination will also reveal the extent of consumer abuse. The presence of unusual chemicals, grease, pipe dope, and other substances may give some clues. Heavy marks and gouges could be the sign of excessively applied external force.
The defective part should also be cut in half using a sharp saw blade. The object here is to look for voids caused by trapped gas and excessive shrinkage, especially in thick sections during molding. A reduction in wall thickness caused by such voids could be less than adequate for supporting compressive or tensile force or withstanding impact load and may cause part to fail. Last, if the product has failed because of exposure to UV rays and other environmental factors, a slight chalking, microscopic cracks, large readily visible cracks, or loss of color will be evident.
Identification Analysis
One of the main reasons for product failure is simply use of the wrong material. When a defective product is returned from the field, material identification tests must be carried out to verify that the material used in the defective product is, in fact, the material specified on the product drawing. However, identifying the type of material is simply not enough. Since all plastic materials are supplied in a variety of grades with a broad range of properties, the grade of material must also be determined. A simple technique such as the melt index test can be carried out to confirm the grade of a particular type of material. The percentage of regrind material mixed with virgin material has a significant effect on the physical properties. Generally, the higher the level of regrind material mixed with virgin, the lower the physical properties. If during processing, higher than recommended temperature and long residence time is used, chances are that the material is degraded. This degraded material, when reground and mixed with virgin material, can cause a significant reduction in overall properties.
About the Author
| Vishu Shah Consultek Consulting Group www.consultekusa.com www.plasticexpertwitness.com www.theplasticfailureanalysis.com |
Vishu H. Shah is President of Consultek Consulting Group, a technical and management consulting firm for plastics professionals. His 35 years of extensive practical experience in plastics Industry includes positions as president and cofounder of Performance Engineered products, Senior Plastics Engineer of Rain Bird Corporation and Nibco Inc. His areas of expertise include product design, processing, automation, materials, rapid prototyping, tooling, failure analysis and testing. His industry related experience ranges from developing and training personnel, writing standard operating procedures, obtaining certifications, negotiating major contracts, and developing business plans for growth and expansion as a custom Injection Molder, Providing technical services to engineering and quality assurance staff in the area of material selection, product development, processing, tooling design, and inspection techniques, setting up and running PVC compounding operation, developing formulations, and automation projects to serving as expert witness for legal community. |
The views, opinions and technical analyses presented here are those of the author or advertiser, and are not necessarily those of ULProspector.com or UL Solutions. The appearance of this content in the UL Prospector Knowledge Center does not constitute an endorsement by UL Solutions or its affiliates.
All content is subject to copyright and may not be reproduced without prior authorization from UL Solutions or the content author.
The content has been made available for informational and educational purposes only. While the editors of this site may verify the accuracy of its content from time to time, we assume no responsibility for errors made by the author, editorial staff or any other contributor.
UL Solutions does not make any representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy, applicability, fitness or completeness of the content. UL Solutions does not warrant the performance, effectiveness or applicability of sites listed or linked to in any content.